Small-cell carcinoma in the head and neck region: A propensity score-matched analysis of the effect of surgery
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Head and neck small-cell carcinoma (HNSmCC) is a rare and aggressive cancer with a high tendency for distant metastasis. It is treated with multimodal treatment involving chemotherapy. Occasionally, surgery is performed for the management of locoregional HNSmCC. However, the benefits of surgery in this context have not yet been elucidated. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate whether surgery could improve the survival of patients with HNSmCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We obtained data from patients with locoregional HNSmCC treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients who did and did not undergo surgery were matched using propensity scores. The overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and tested using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The 5-year OS rates of the patients who did and did not undergo surgery were 57.2% and 50.6%, respectively (P = 0.689); the corresponding 5-year DSS rates were 61.0% and 57.5% (P = 0.769). The adjusted HRs for surgery were 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-1.33) for OS and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.51-1.49) for DSS. CONCLUSION: The addition of surgery to CRT did not improve the survival of patients with locoregional HNSmCC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Small-cell carcinoma in the head and neck region: A propensity score-matched analysis of the effect of surgery
- Date Crossref
- 24/10/2024
- Éditeur
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.