High-precision measurements of the atomic mass and electron-capture decay Q value of 95Tc
Rattachement africain : fi, ro, fr, be, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A direct measurement of the ground-state-to-ground-state electron-capture decay Q value of 95 Tc has been performed utilizing the double Penning trap mass spectrometer JYFLTRAP. The Q value was determined to be 1695.92(13) keV by taking advantage of the high resolving power of the phase-imaging ion-cyclotron-resonance technique to resolve the low-lying isomeric state of 95 Tc (excitation energy of 38.910(40) keV) from the ground state. The mass excess of 95 Tc was measured to be −86015.95(18) keV/c 2 , exhibiting a precision of about 28 times higher and in agreement with the value from the newest Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME2020). Combined with the nuclear energy-level data for the decay-daughter 95 Mo, two potential ultra-low Q -value transitions are identified for future long-term neutrino-mass determination experiments. The atomic self-consistent many-electron Dirac–Hartree–Fock–Slater method and the nuclear shell model have been used to predict the partial half-lives and energy-release distributions for the two transitions. The dominant correction terms related to those processes are considered, including the exchange and overlap corrections, and the shake-up and shake-off effects. The normalized distribution of the released energy in the electron-capture decay of 95 Tc to excited states of 95 Mo is compared to that of 163 Ho currently being used for electron-neutrino-mass determination.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- High-precision measurements of the atomic mass and electron-capture decay Q value of 95Tc
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.