Population pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir following intramuscular thigh injections in adults with and without HIV

Résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT Cabotegravir intramuscular gluteal injection is approved for HIV treatment (with rilpivirine) and prevention. Thigh muscle is a potential alternative injection site. We aim to characterize cabotegravir pharmacokinetics and its association with demographics following intramuscular thigh injection in comparison with gluteal injection using population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis. Fourteen HIV-negative participants received 600 mg single thigh injection in phase 1 study 208832 and 118 participants with HIV received thigh injections 400 mg monthly 4× or 600 mg once-every-2-months 2× after ≥3 years of gluteal injections in phase 3b study ATLAS-2M provided 1,249 cabotegravir concentrations from 366 thigh injections and 1,998 concentrations from 1,618 gluteal injections. The established gluteal PPK model was modified by adding thigh injection compartment and fit to pharmacokinetic data following both gluteal and thigh injections, enabling within-person comparison in ATLAS-2M. Gluteal parameters were fixed. Similar to the gluteal absorption rate constant (KA gluteal ), the thigh absorption rate constant (KA thigh ) was slower in females than males and in participants with higher BMI. KA thigh was strongly correlated with KA gluteal (correlation coefficient 0.766), best described by the additive linear relationship KA thigh = KA gluteal + 0.0002527 h −1 . Terminal half-life of thigh injection was 26% (male) and 39% (female) shorter than gluteal injection. Relative bioavailability of thigh to gluteal was estimated to be 89.9%. The impact of covariates on cabotegravir exposure following thigh injections was ≤35%. In conclusion, cabotegravir absorption following thigh injection was correlated with, faster than, and 10% less bioavailable than gluteal injection, and correlated with sex and BMI. The cabotegravir thigh PPK model can inform dosing strategies and future study design.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.