Optimising Paediatric HIV Treatment: Recent Developments and Future Directions

Le résumé fourni par la source

Treatment options for children living with HIV have historically been less effective, less practical and more difficult to implement compared with those for adults, as the research and development of new drugs for children has lagged behind. Significant progress has been achieved in response to the paediatric HIV epidemic over the last decade. Several optimised paediatric antiretroviral formulations are currently available or in development, including fixed-dose combination tablets containing a complete World Health Organization-recommended regimen. Despite these advancements, virological suppression rates in children are generally lower than in adults. Even when oral fixed-dose combinations with the optimal target profiles are developed, for some children virological suppression is not achievable for reasons such as adherence challenges, intolerance, toxicity and genotypic resistance. New safe, effective, well-tolerated antiretroviral agents from existing and novel classes, as well as innovative administration strategies are essential. To achieve the UNAIDS target of virological suppression in 95% of children receiving antiretroviral therapy, concerted efforts are required. This includes identifying priority drugs in line with latest developments, focusing drug development studies on these priorities, ensuring a timely technical knowledge transfer between originator and generic companies, accelerating regulatory approvals and facilitating procurement and implementation in countries. Success in these efforts depends on collaboration among all stakeholders, including communities, researchers, pharmaceutical companies, guideline and policymakers, governments, funders, regulators and healthcare providers. This review outlines which paediatric antiretroviral therapies are currently available, those which are under development and the future directions of paediatric HIV treatment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.