Mass spectrometry proteomic profiling of postmortem human muscle degradation for PMI estimation
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The discovery of new methods for determining the post-mortem interval is of significant forensic interest. Mass spectrometry has enhanced the accuracy of assessing post-mortem protein decay, with skeletal muscle being the most studied substrate due to its intrinsic properties of postmortem decay. In this pilot study, human skeletal muscle tissue (iliopsoas) was harvested and allowed to decay under controlled temperature and humidity conditions at predetermined intervals. The samples were analyzed using mass spectrometry proteomics for both qualitative and quantitative evaluation of proteins and peptides. Candidate proteins were validated through immunoblotting. The results were significant, identifying several proteins that could aid in estimating the post-mortem interval. Notably, PLIN4, MYOZ2, SYNPO2, and BAG3 were validated by immunoblotting over a broader range of experimental points and temperatures. Furthermore, human results were compared with animal muscle samples from a previous study, revealing similarities in decomposition kinetics. This analysis of human samples marks a step forward in the potential forensic application of proteomic evaluation by mass spectrometry. • Proteomic approach seems to be beneficial for PMI estimation. • Mass spectrometry constitutes a significant advancement in the analysis of protein markers for PMI. • The proteins with better PMI kinetics appear to be MYOZ2, HNRNPA2B1 and PDLIM1.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mass spectrometry proteomic profiling of postmortem human muscle degradation for PMI estimation
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.