Analytical Validation of a Pan-Cancer NGS Assay for In-House Liquid Biopsy Testing: An International Multicenter Study
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Liquid biopsy (LBx) assays are transforming precision oncology by the screening of genomic alterations in cfDNA. These assays provide a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsies, which are not always feasible. Molecular pathology laboratories require LBx assays that detect variants at low allele frequencies using standardized methods. Methods This study evaluated the Hedera Profiling 2 ctDNA test panel (HP2) (Hedera Dx, Epalinges, Switzerland), a hybrid capture-based NGS assay for the detection of somatic alterations from cfDNA. Covering 32 genes, HP2 enables the detection of SNVs, Indels, Fusions, CNVs, and MSI status from a single DNA-only workflow. The analytical performance was assessed using reference standards and a diverse cohort of 137 clinical samples pre-characterized by orthogonal methods. Results In reference standards at 0.5% VAF, detection sensitivity and specificity for SNVs/Indels were 96.92% and 99.67%, respectively, and 100% each for Fusions. For MSI with VAFs of ≥1% and CNVs with VAFs of ≥ 2% both achieved 100% sensitivity. Conclusion This international, multicenter analytical performance evaluation study across a large number of hospital laboratories demonstrated high concordance of HP2 assay with orthogonal methods, confirming its significant potential as a highly sensitive, and efficient Pan-Cancer test for future decentralized LBx testing.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Analytical Validation of a Pan-Cancer NGS Assay for In-House Liquid Biopsy Testing: An International Multicenter Study
- Date Crossref
- 19/10/2024
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.