Molecular mechanisms of re-emerging chloramphenicol susceptibility in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales
Rattachement africain : gb, au, Malawi. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Infections with Enterobacterales (E) are increasingly difficult to treat due to antimicrobial resistance. After ceftriaxone replaced chloramphenicol (CHL) as empiric therapy for suspected sepsis in Malawi in 2004, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-E rapidly emerged. Concurrently, resistance to CHL in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. decreased, raising the possibility of CHL re-introduction. However, many phenotypically susceptible isolates still carry CHL acetyltransferase (cat) genes. To understand the molecular mechanisms and stability of this re-emerging CHL susceptibility we use a combination of genomics, phenotypic susceptibility assays, experimental evolution, and functional assays for CAT activity. Here, we show that of 840 Malawian E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates, 31% have discordant CHL susceptibility genotype-phenotype, and we select a subset of 42 isolates for in-depth analysis. Stable degradation of cat genes by insertion sequences leads to re-emergence of CHL susceptibility. Our study suggests that CHL could be reintroduced as a reserve agent for critically ill patients with ESBL-E infections in Malawi and similar settings and highlights the ongoing challenges in inferring antimicrobial resistance from sequence data.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Molecular mechanisms of re-emerging chloramphenicol susceptibility in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales
- Date Crossref
- 18/10/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.