Effects of Different Surface Treatment Methods on Laser Welding of Aluminum Alloy and Glass

Le résumé fourni par la source

Hermetic glass-to-metal sealing (GMTS) technology combines metal and glass and can be used to construct vacuum tubes; electric discharge tubes; semiconductor diodes; reed switches; and pressure-tight glass-to-metal windows, optical windows, and lenses in electronics or electronic systems. The hermetic and mechanically strong seals engineered using GTMS are highly reliable, making them suitable for deployment in harsh environments and for applications requiring high performance. However, it has always been challenging to precisely and robustly join glass and metal due to the significant disparities in their properties. In this study, the laser transmission welding of borosilicate glass and aluminum alloy using a pulsed Nd:YAG laser to achieve hermetic glass–metal seals was experimentally investigated. This research focused on various processing parameters and the influence of surface conditions on bonding quality. Three different types of surfaces—a polished surface, a surface subjected to preoxidation, and a laser-modified surface—were compared. To evaluate the weld strength, shear-tensile separation forces were measured. The analysis of fracture and separation encompassed detailed examinations of the weld morphology, microstructure, and elemental composition. The results revealed that increasing the laser welding energy initially enhanced the weld strength until a saturation point was reached. Among the three different surface treatments tested, the laser surface modification of aluminum alloy yielded the highest weld strength. The maximum achieved bond force exceeded 35.38 N, demonstrating the feasibility of using cost-effective pulsed laser welding for glass-to-metal sealing. The results were significantly better than those from previous research in which aluminum alloy surfaces were pretreated using microarc oxidation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.