Eddington ratios of dust-obscured quasars at z ≲ 1: Evidence supporting dust-obscured quasars as young quasars
Rattachement africain : kr, us, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Dust-obscured quasars have been suspected of being the intermediate-stage galaxies between merger-driven star-forming galaxies and unobscured quasars. This merger-driven galaxy evolution scenario suggests that dust-obscured quasars exhibit higher Eddington ratios (λEdd) than those of unobscured quasars. However, their high dust obscuration poses challenges to accurately measuring their λEdd using commonly employed bolometric luminosity (Lbol) and black hole mass (MBH) estimators based on the ultraviolet or optical luminosity. Recently, new estimators for Lbol and MBH based on mid-infrared continuum luminosity (LMIR) were established, which are less affected by dust obscuration. These estimators enable the study of a large number of dust-obscured quasars across a wide redshift range. In this study, we measure the λEdd values of 30 dust-obscured quasars at z ≲ 1, the largest sample size to date, using the LMIR-based Lbol and MBH estimators. Our findings reveal that dust-obscured quasars exhibit significantly higher λEdd values compared to unobscured quasars. Moreover, we confirm that the enhanced λEdd values of dust-obscured quasars maintain consistency across the redshift span of 0 to 1. Our results strongly support the picture that dust-obscured quasars are in an earlier stage than unobscured quasars on the merger-driven galaxy evolutionary track.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Eddington ratios of dust-obscured quasars at <i>z</i> ≲ 1: Evidence supporting dust-obscured quasars as young quasars
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2024
- Éditeur
- EDP Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.