Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Perceptions of hearing loss and hearing technology among the general public and healthcare providers: a scoping review

7Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objectives: Synthesise literature related to perceptions of hearing loss and hearing technology (hearing aids, cochlear implants) among the general public and healthcare providers who do not specialise in ear and hearing care. Design: Scoping review. Data sources: We searched three databases (PubMed, Scopus, Ovid Medline) in August 2023 for peer-reviewed articles from inception to 2023. Eligibility criteria: Peer-reviewed articles or grey literature published in English or Spanish and that were observational or mixed methods were eligible for inclusion. Studies were included if they presented results from original research focused on perceptions of hearing loss and/or hearing technology among the general public and/or healthcare providers who do not specialise in ear and hearing care. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers extracted and verified study data, which are synthesised in tables and in the text. Results: Twenty-nine peer-reviewed articles were included, 21 of which focused on samples of the general public and 8 on samples of healthcare providers. Perceptions about persons with hearing loss and the use of hearing technology are varied but often negative. The general public and healthcare providers often perceive hearing loss as less serious than other health conditions, including other sensory impairments. In many settings worldwide, the perception that non-biomedical factors, such as curses or evil spirits, can cause hearing loss is common. Importantly, studies showed training that aimed to raise awareness about hearing loss might improve negative or inaccurate perceptions of hearing loss and hearing technology. Conclusions: Perceptions of hearing loss and hearing technology are varied but often misinformed and negative. Such information could inform initiatives to raise awareness and change behaviours guided by those perceptions. Ultimately, changing the public's and healthcare providers' perceptions of hearing loss could encourage individuals with hearing loss to seek hearing care in a timely and appropriate manner.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Perceptions of hearing loss and hearing technology among the general public and healthcare providers: a scoping review
Date Crossref
01/10/2024
Éditeur
BMJ
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Medical University of South Carolina Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • World Health Organization pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Department of Noncommunicable Diseases pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery — Medical University of South Carolina, World Health Organization et Department of Noncommunicable Diseases.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing Impairment and CommunicationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.