Cryoprobe biopsy versus mechanical biopsies in pulmonary diagnostics
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biopsy tools have been essential in improving the diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopic procedures. Of these tools, cryobiopsy has emerged as a promising technique for diagnosing thoracic diseases. This review summarizes the existing data comparing cryobiopsies to other mechanical biopsy methods for sampling endobronchial, parenchymal, and mediastinal targets. RECENT FINDINGS: Initially adopted for managing airway stenoses, the use of cryoprobes has expanded to diagnosing endobronchial lesions, parenchymal opacities, and mediastinal lymph node pathologies. Studies have demonstrated that cryobiopsy offers a higher diagnostic yield than forceps biopsy alone. By leveraging the Joule-Thomson effect to freeze and collect larger tissue samples compared to traditional methods, cryobiopsy improves diagnostic accuracy and helps in better characterizing the nature of the lesions. While the risk of complications, such as pneumothorax and hemorrhage are comparable to, or higher than traditional biopsy methods, cryobiopsy's enhanced diagnostic capabilities make it a valuable tool in the assessment of pulmonary disease. SUMMARY: Compared with other mechanical biopsy techniques, cryoprobe biopsies significantly enhance the diagnostic yield for endobronchial lesions, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary nodules, and mediastinal lymph nodes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Cryoprobe biopsy versus mechanical biopsies in pulmonary diagnostics
- Date Crossref
- 16/10/2024
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.