Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 review

Relationship between regulatory processes and problematic social media use: A systematic review

10Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

This review aimed to synthesize and analyze the relationship between regulatory processes (self-regulation, emotion regulation, self-control and impulsivity) and problematic social media use (PSMU) in the general population. A systematic search was conducted in five databases, and all articles published from May 2013 to April 2024 were identified. After screening 2655 articles, 45 studies were included in the review. The total sample comprised 34,332 participants. The results confirm the effect of regulatory processes on the PSMU. This relationship is present in all age groups and in different cultures. Furthermore, the mediating effect of regulation on the relationship between PSMU and variables like anxiety, depression, self-esteem or attachment has been observed. Despite the confirmatory nature of these studies, their results should be interpreted with caution because they may be influenced by certain methodological limitations in the research on which they are based. Regulatory processes play a fundamental role in the PSMU. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of this behavior and offer insights for the development of effective prevention and intervention strategies. • In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in analyzing the relationship between regulation and social media use. • There is a direct negative relationship between problematic social media use and regulation. • Regulation also acts as a mediator between problematic social media use and other variables. • The regulation is a crucial factor in the usage patterns of these platforms. • Emotion regulation is the most studied construct, with the strongest evidence of its link to problematic platform use.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Relationship between regulatory processes and problematic social media use: A systematic review
Date Crossref
01/12/2024
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Media and PoliticsChild Development and Digital Technology

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.