Pre-Hydration and a Forced Diuresis Protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT Yielded an Optimal Effect on Primary Pelvic Malignancies
Rattachement africain : tw. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-FDG is being used more frequently to evaluate primary pelvic tumors (PTs). However, a standardized hydration protocol is essential for an optimal diuretic effect and constant results. Methods: We reviewed 109 patients with PTs who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations between November 2006 and April 2013. Four different protocols were used: (a) no hydration (group 1); (b) oral hydration (800 mL) after an early scan (group 2); (c) intravenous (IV) hydration (500 mL) during an early scan followed by oral hydration (800 mL) and IV furosemide (20 mg) after an early scan (group 3); and (d) oral hydration (800 mL) before an FDG injection followed by the protocol from group 3 (group 4). The maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) of the urinary bladder (UB) and PTs and the PT/UB SUVmax ratios were examined. Results: The UB SUVmax of group 4 was significantly lower in the early scan compared to that in the other three groups. Group 4 had a significantly higher PT/UB SUVmax ratio in the early scan than the other three groups, and it also had a 52.5% positivity rate for PTs. Conclusions: The pre-hydration plus forced diuresis protocol yielded the optimal effect of UB radiotracer washout and had the best PT/UB SUVmax ratio in both scans.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pre-Hydration and a Forced Diuresis Protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT Yielded an Optimal Effect on Primary Pelvic Malignancies
- Date Crossref
- 12/10/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.