Comparison of Predictive Factors of Flu Vaccine Uptake Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Using the NIS-Teen Survey
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Seasonal influenza vaccination rates are very low among teenagers. Objectives: We used publicly available data from the NIS-Teen annual national immunization survey to explore factors that influence the likelihood of a teen receiving their seasonal flu shot. Methods: Traditional stepwise multivariable regression was used in tandem with machine learning to determine the predictive factors in teen vaccine uptake. Results and Conclusions: Age was the largest predictor, with older teens being much less likely to be vaccinated than younger teens (97.48% compared to 41.71%, p < 0.0001). Provider participation in government programs such as Vaccines for Children and the state vaccine registry positively impacts vaccine uptake (p < 0.0001). Identifying as non-Hispanic Black was a small, negative predictor of teen vaccine uptake (78.18% unvaccinated compared to 73.78% of White teens, p < 0.0001). The state quartile for COVID-19 vaccine uptake also strongly predicted flu vaccine uptake, with the upper quartile of state COVID-19 vaccine uptake being significantly more likely to also get vaccinated for influenza (76.96%, 74.94%, 74.55%, and 72.97%, p < 0.0001). Other significant factors are the number of providers, education of the mother, poverty status, and having a mixed provider facility type. Additionally, the multivariable regression analysis revealed little difference in the predictive factors of vaccine uptake between pre- and post-pandemic datasets.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of Predictive Factors of Flu Vaccine Uptake Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Using the NIS-Teen Survey
- Date Crossref
- 12/10/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.