Anti-tumor activity of camptothecin analog conjugate of a RSPO4-based peptibody targeting LGR4/5/6 in preclinical models of colorectal cancer
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a major modality of targeted cancer therapy, yet no ADC has been approved specifically for colorectal cancer (CRC). LGR4/5/6 (leucine-rich repeat containing, G protein-coupled receptor 4, 5, 6) are three related receptors that are expressed at high levels together or alternately in nearly all cases of CRC. ADCs targeting LGR5 have been shown to have robust anti-tumor potency, but not all CRC cells express LGR5 and LGR5-positive tumor cells may lose LGR5 expression due to cancer cell plasticity. R-spondin 4 (RSPO4) is a natural protein ligand of LGR4/5/6 with high affinity for all three receptors. We fused a mutant form of RSPO4 furin domain that retains high affinity binding to LGR4/5/6 to human IgG1 Fc to create a peptibody designated R462. Conjugation of R462 with a camptothecin analog designated CPT2 at eight drugs per peptibody led to the generation of R462-CPT2 that showed highly potent cytotoxic activity in vitro in CRC cell lines expressing any of LG4/5/6. In cell line xenograft and PDX models of CRC, R462-CPT2 demonstrated robust anti-tumor effect. Importantly, R462-CPT2 showed no major adverse effect at therapeutically effective dose levels. These results strongly support the use of RSPO ligand drug-conjugates that target LGR4/5/6 simultaneously for the treatment of CRC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Anti-tumor activity of camptothecin analog conjugate of a RSPO4-based peptibody targeting LGR4/5/6 in preclinical models of colorectal cancer
- Date Crossref
- 11/10/2024
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.