Characterising treatment pathways for natural menopausal symptoms in UK women
Résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: Treatments for menopause symptoms include hormone therapy (HT) and nonhormonal treatments (non-HTs); clonidine is the only UK-approved non-HT for vasomotor symptoms (VMS). Real-world data on medication use are limited. This study described treatment pathways for menopause symptoms in UK women. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum (01/2009-03/2021). Treatment pathways for menopause symptoms followed by >30 women were assessed in women aged 40-65 after first diagnosis of natural menopause. Gaps of <30 days between prescriptions indicated a combination of treatments; ≥30 days, a switch. Sensitivity analyses with increased gaps (60, 90, 180 days) were conducted. Results: The study included 214,374 women (57.2% aged 50-59). 79,826 (37.2%) followed a treatment pathway consisting of >30 women. Of these, 55,761 (69.9%) had only one treatment line; most prescribed were estrogens alone (19.9%), combined progestogens+estrogens (9.1%), amitriptyline (8.6%), sertraline (6.1%), and citalopram (5.5%). Two or more treatment lines were reported in 24,065 (30.1%); first-line estrogens and second-line progestogens+estrogens (3.5%) was the most common pathway, followed by switches from estrogens to amitriptyline (1.1%) or sertraline (1.0%). Across all treatment pathways, amitriptyline was the most prescribed non-HT (15.8%), with fewer clonidine prescriptions (7.3%). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Characterising treatment pathways for natural menopausal symptoms in UK women
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2024
- Éditeur
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.