Evaluation of ACR TI-RADS for Predicting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules: Insights from Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Histopathology Results
Résumé fourni par la source
The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) stratifies patients with thyroid nodules for further evaluation. We evaluated the accuracy of this risk stratification and compared it with that of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and final pathology. The nodules (n = 381) of 329 patients (mean age, 45.5 y; 251 female) who underwent thyroid surgery from January 2021 to September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed for the ACR TI-RADS, FNAC, and final pathology results. The nodules were categorized according to risk of malignancy as 75.9% ACR TI-RADS 5, 72.6% ACR TI-RADS 4, 38.9% ACR TI-RADS 3, and 33.3% ACR TI-RADS 2. Considering ACR TI-RADS 5 and 4 as high-risk categories, the sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value of the ACR TI-RADS categories were 77.9%, 57.3%, 73.8%, and 62.8%, respectively. With both ACR TI-RADS and FNAC high-risk categories combined, the sensitivity and specificity improved to 82.4% and 58.6%, respectively. The ACR TI-RADS score effectively predicts malignancy in higher-risk categories; however, some malignant cases were found within lower-risk categories, implying the need for careful utilization of this system. Combining high-risk ACR TI-RADS and FNAC results improves the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid nodules. Confirmation from further prospective studies is required.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of ACR TI-RADS for Predicting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules: Insights from Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Histopathology Results
- Date Crossref
- 10/10/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.