Comparison of Exercise Protocols for Diagnosing Pediatric Unexplained Dyspnea on Exertion

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: Clinicians evaluating pediatric patients with unexplained dyspnea on exertion (DOE) often obtain exercise testing with a treadmill-based exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) protocol measuring only changes in spirometry. We modified the EIB protocol to collect metabolic and lung volume endpoints as obtained in a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). We tested the hypothesis that measuring metabolic data with the EIB protocol (EIB-CPET) would yield greater diagnostic information than the EIB protocol. METHODS: Exercise test diagnosis for healthy children with DOE referred to the pulmonary exercise lab from January 2011 through July 2023 were retrospectively compared between those performing either the EIB or EIB-CPET protocols. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients with unexplained DOE were analyzed. Of the 72 patients tested on the EIB protocol, 49% had stridor and 5% with EIB. Of the 55 patients tested on the EIB-CPET protocol, 42% had stridor, 42% with normal physiologic limitation, 22% with dysfunctional breathing, 5% with deconditioning, 2% with EIB, and 2% with exercise-induced hypoxemia. Patients performing the EIB-CPET protocol had a significantly higher rate of any diagnosis compared with EIB (P = .0002). CONCLUSIONS: There is a greater diagnostic yield in children with unexplained DOE performing the EIB-CPET protocol compared with patients performing the EIB protocol.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.