Accès ouvert déclaré
2024
article
Phase transitions in random circuit sampling
Alexis Morvan, Benjamin Villalonga, Xiao Mi, Salvatore Mandrà, Andreas Bengtsson, Paul V. Klimov, Z. Chen, Sabrina Hong, Catherine Erickson, Ilya Drozdov, J. Chau, G. Laun, R. Movassagh, Abraham Asfaw, Luís T. A. N. Brandão, René Peralta, Dmitry A. Abanin, Rajeev Acharya, R. M. Allen, T. I. Andersen, K. R. Anderson, M. Ansmann, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Juan Atalaya, Joseph C. Bardin, Alexander Bilmes, Gina Bortoli, Alexandre Bourassa, Jenna Bovaird, L. Brill, Michael Broughton, B. B. Buckley, David A. Buell, Tim Burger, Brian Burkett, Nicholas Bushnell, Juan Campero, Hung-Shen Chang, B. Chiaro, D. Chik, C. W. Chou, J. Cogan, Roberto Collins, P. Conner, William Courtney, A. L. Crook, Ben Curtin, Dripto M. Debroy, Alexander Del Toro Barba, Sean Demura, Agustín Di Paolo, A. Dunsworth, Lara Faoro, Edward Farhi, Reza Fatemi, V. S. Ferreira, Leslie Flores Burgos, Ebrahim Forati, A. G. Fowler, Brooks Foxen, G. Garcia, Élie Genois, William Giang, Craig Gidney, D. Gilboa, Marissa Giustina, Raja Gosula, Alejandro Grajales Dau, Jonathan A. Gross, Steve Habegger, Michael C. Hamilton, M. Hansen, Matthew P. Harrigan, Sean D. Harrington, Paula Heu, M. R. Hoffmann, Trent Huang, Ashley Huff, William J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, S. V. Isakov, Justin Iveland, E. Jeffrey, C. Jones, Pavol Juhás, Dvir Kafri, Tanuj Khattar, Mostafa Khezri, Mária Kieferová, S. Kim, Alexei Kitaev, A. R. Klots, A. N. Korotkov, Fedor Kostritsa, John Mark Kreikebaum, David Landhuis, Pavel Laptev, K-M Lau, Lily Laws, J. Lee, Kenny Lee, Y. D. Lensky, Brian Lester, Alexander T. Lill, W. Liu, William P. Livingston, Aditya Locharla, F. D. Malone, Orion Martin, Steven W. Martin, Jarrod R. McClean, Matt McEwen, Kevin C. Miao, A. Mieszala, Shirin Montazeri, Wojciech Mruczkiewicz, Ofer Naaman, M. Neeley, Charles Neill, A. Nersisyan, Michael Newman, Jiun How Ng, A. Nguyen, Murray Nguyen, M. Yuezhen Niu, Thomas E. O’Brien, S. Omonije, Alex Opremcak, A. Petukhov, R. Potter, Leonid P. Pryadko, Chris Quintana, David M. Rhodes, C. Rocque, Eliott Rosenberg, Nicholas C. Rubin, Negar Saei, D. Sank, Kannan Sankaragomathi, Kevin J. Satzinger, Henry F. Schurkus, C. Schuster, M. J. Shearn, Aaron Shorter, Noah Shutty, Vladimir Shvarts, V. Sivak, Jindra Skruzny, W. C. Smith, R. D. Somma, G. Sterling, Doug Strain, Marco Szalay, Douglas Thor, A. Torres, Guifré Vidal, Catherine Vollgraff Heidweiller, T. White, Bryan W. K. Woo, C. Xing, Z. Jamie Yao, P. Yeh, Juhwan Yoo, G. Young, Adam Zalcman, Y. Zhang, Ningfeng Zhu, Nicholas Zobrist, Eleanor Rieffel, R. Biswas, Ryan Babbush, Dave Bacon, Jeremy Hilton, Erik Lucero, Hartmut Neven, A. Megrant, J. Kelly, P. Roushan, I. L. Aleǐner, Vadim Smelyanskiy, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Yu Chen, Sergio Boixo
110Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
10Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés
Rattachement africain : us, au.
Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Undesired coupling to the surrounding environment destroys long-range correlations in quantum processors and hinders coherent evolution in the nominally available computational space. This noise is an outstanding challenge when leveraging the computation power of near-term quantum processors1. It has been shown that benchmarking random circuit sampling with cross-entropy benchmarking can provide an estimate of the effective size of the Hilbert space coherently available2–8. Nevertheless, quantum algorithms’ outputs can be trivialized by noise, making them susceptible to classical computation spoofing. Here, by implementing an algorithm for random circuit sampling, we demonstrate experimentally that two phase transitions are observable with cross-entropy benchmarking, which we explain theoretically with a statistical model. The first is a dynamical transition as a function of the number of cycles and is the continuation of the anti-concentration point in the noiseless case. The second is a quantum phase transition controlled by the error per cycle; to identify it analytically and experimentally, we create a weak-link model, which allows us to vary the strength of the noise versus coherent evolution. Furthermore, by presenting a random circuit sampling experiment in the weak-noise phase with 67 qubits at 32 cycles, we demonstrate that the computational cost of our experiment is beyond the capabilities of existing classical supercomputers. Our experimental and theoretical work establishes the existence of transitions to a stable, computationally complex phase that is reachable with current quantum processors. By implementing random circuit sampling, experimental and theoretical results establish the existence of transitions to a stable, computationally complex phase that is reachable with current quantum processors.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Phase transitions in random circuit sampling
- Date Crossref
- 09/10/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.
Les sujets associés
Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsQuantum and electron transport phenomena