Runner Bean (Phaseolus coccineusL.)
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Runner bean, a legume species originating from Mesoamerica, has a close genetic relationship with the common bean. Although classified as perennial, it is typically cultivated as an annual crop for its edible immature pods and dry seeds. Domestication of Phaseolus and its related species has been observed several times, indicating their usefulness and suitability for domestication. The genus Phaseolus contains various groups or natural gene pools. While genetic research on the common bean is extensive, runner bean has received comparatively less attention. Approximately 4685 runner bean accessions have been reported worldwide, encompassing a wide range of phenotypic variation and distinct genetic traits. This extensive genetic diversity is critical for crop improvement, providing a reservoir of disease resistance and cold-tolerance features. Nevertheless, the limited characterization of the germplasm hinders its potential as a donor species for inter-specific hybridization, thereby restricting its application in Phaseolus breeding efforts, such as for the improvement of common bean. Achieving the development of cultivars that are adaptable to a wide range of conditions and have a fixed growth pattern, which would make mechanical harvesting easier, is a significant challenge and opportunity for the future. The diversity and population differentiation levels of runner bean suggest that it has the potential to serve as an excellent source of variability for breeding several plant traits.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Runner Bean (<i>Phaseolus coccineus</i>L.)
- Date Crossref
- 30/09/2024
- Éditeur
- CABI
- Type
- book-chapter
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.