New frontiers in domain-inspired radiomics and radiogenomics: increasing role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification and grading following WHO CNS-5 updates

Le résumé fourni par la source

Gliomas and Glioblastomas represent a significant portion of central nervous system (CNS) tumors associated with high mortality rates and variable prognosis. In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its Glioma classification criteria, most notably incorporating molecular markers including CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, + 7/-10 chromosome copy number changes, and others into the grading and classification of adult and pediatric Gliomas. The inclusion of these markers and the corresponding introduction of new Glioma subtypes has allowed for more specific tailoring of clinical interventions and has inspired a new wave of Radiogenomic studies seeking to leverage medical imaging information to explore the diagnostic and prognostic implications of these new biomarkers. Radiomics, deep learning, and combined approaches have enabled the development of powerful computational tools for MRI analysis correlating imaging characteristics with various molecular biomarkers integrated into the updated WHO CNS-5 guidelines. Recent studies have leveraged these methods to accurately classify Gliomas in accordance with these updated molecular-based criteria based solely on non-invasive MRI, demonstrating the great promise of Radiogenomic tools. In this review, we explore the relative benefits and drawbacks of these computational frameworks and highlight the technical and clinical innovations presented by recent studies in the landscape of fast evolving molecular-based Glioma subtyping. Furthermore, the potential benefits and challenges of incorporating these tools into routine radiological workflows, aiming to enhance patient care and optimize clinical outcomes in the evolving field of CNS tumor management, have been highlighted.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.