Effect of tocilizumab on endothelial and platelet-derived CXC-chemokines and their association with inflammation and myocardial injury in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab improves myocardial salvage in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients when administered before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The mechanisms underlying ischemia-reperfusion injury remain unclear. In this sub-study, we investigated whether endothelial and platelet-derived CXC chemokines are involved, as they represent inflammatory mediators from two cell types relevant to myocardial infarction. Associations between these chemokines and neutrophils, C-reactive protein (CRP), troponin T (TnT), myocardial salvage index (MSI), microvascular obstruction (MVO), and infarct size. METHODS: This is a sub-study of the ASSAIL-MI trial, a double-blind clinical trial that randomized 199 STEMI patients to receive either 280 mg tocilizumab (n = 101) or placebo (n = 98) intravenously before PCI. Blood samples were collected prior to infusion, at day 1-2, 3-7, and at 3 and 6 months. Heparin was administered before baseline in 150 patients, while 49 received it after. We measured CXC-chemokines CXCL4, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, and CXCL12 using immunoassays. Cardiac MRI was performed in the first week and at 6 months. RESULTS: Tocilizumab did not significantly affect CXC-chemokines levels. Although some correlations were observed between chemokine levels and neutrophil counts and CRP, none of the CXC chemokines were associated with infarct size, MSI, MVO, or TnT levels. Notably, CXCL 12 levels increased in patients who received heparin before baseline, while other CXC-chemokines decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the beneficial effects of tocilizumab in STEMI patients are not due to changes in circulating endothelial or platelet-derived CXC-chemokines, compared to placebo. However, heparin significantly influences the levels of these chemokines.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.