Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

The McMaster Cough Severity Questionnaire (MCSQ): a cough severity instrument for patients with refractory chronic cough

12Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
17Institutions déclarées
7Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Cough severity represents an important end-point to assess the impact of therapies for patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC). Our objective was to develop a new patient-reported outcome measure addressing cough severity in patients with RCC. METHODS: Phase 1 (item generation): a systematic survey, focus groups and expert consultation generated 51 items. Phase 2 (item reduction): from a list of 51 items, 100 patients identified those they had experienced in the previous year and rated their importance on a 5-point scale. The McMaster Cough Severity Questionnaire (MCSQ) included items reported to occur most frequently and that had the highest importance scores. Patient feedback on the MCSQ led to elimination of redundant items. Another 100 patients completed the MCSQ, from which we performed an exploratory factor analysis and a Rasch analysis to further refine items on the MCSQ. RESULTS: Previous publications report on the details of Phase 1. Phase 2 led to selection of 15 items from the initial 51. Patient feedback on the 15 items led to elimination of five redundant items. An exploratory factor analysis of the 10-item MCSQ led to the selection of two domains, and the elimination of one item that demonstrated cross-loading and another that had high inter-item correlations. A Rasch analysis of the 8-item MCSQ confirmed that the response options functioned in a logically progressive manner and that no items exhibited differential item functioning. The final 8-item MCSQ has a 1-week recall period and includes two domains (intensity and frequency). The 8-item MCSQ had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.89), proved able to distinguish different levels of cough severity (person separation index 0.89) and demonstrated high cross-sectional convergent validity (Pearson's correlation 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.83) with the 100-mm cough severity visual analogue scale. CONCLUSIONS: Initial evidence supports the validity of the MCSQ, an 8-item instrument measuring cough severity in patients with RCC. Future studies should evaluate its properties in measuring change over time.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
The McMaster Cough Severity Questionnaire (MCSQ): a cough severity instrument for patients with refractory chronic cough
Date Crossref
03/10/2024
Éditeur
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Respiratory and Cough-Related ResearchDysphagia Assessment and ManagementChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.