Dedicated Chest Wall Injury Program quality review: How to create and incorporate a quality and safety program for surgical stabilization of rib fractures

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Adoption of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in chest trauma necessitates outcomes reviews and process improvement (PI). As volume and complexity increase, such vigilance is imperative. Over 10 years, our center has developed a dedicated PI program based on our trauma PI program. Here, we outline the components of this program, aiming to share best practices and potentially improve SSRF patient outcomes. METHODS: Over 10 years, our dedicated SSRF PI process has evolved to include bimonthly reviews on case and quality metrics. In 2022, all patients at our single high-volume Level 1 trauma center with flail chest segments were identified, and a PI chart review was conducted. Data collected included management approach (operative vs. nonoperative), postoperative complications, mortality, patient demographics, trauma specific variables (Injury Severity Score, etc.), and rib fracture details. Operative data collected included number of ribs plated, system used, and complication rates for each surgeon and plating system used. RESULTS: Of 82 patients identified, 88% underwent SSRF. Among these, 49% experienced one or more postoperative complications, not all directly related to SSRF procedures. Mortality rate for SSRF patients was 15%, predominantly in those with Injury Severity Score of >25 and mean age of 58 years. Patients who had trauma activations and required emergency department chest tube placement had higher complications. The mean number of ribs stabilized was four. Complications occurred more frequently with posterior fractures. Outcomes were collated and analyzed at SSRF Outcomes Committee. CONCLUSION: The utilization of SSRF underscores the need for a rigorous quality review process to enhance patient safety and SSRF-specific outcomes. Our program developed over time from and was implemented in fashion similar to the trauma PI processes. The resulting quality initiative has fostered center-specific PI projects and programmatic advancements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Value-Base Evaluations; Level IV.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.