Use of Radioguided Surgery for Small and Difficult-to-Locate Relapsed MIBG (+) High-Risk Neuroblastoma Lesions
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: High-risk neuroblastoma, particularly in the relapse/refractory (R/R) setting, poses unique challenges to obtaining the representative-quality tissue that is mostly required for molecular analysis. This study explores the use of 123I-MIBG radioguided surgery to access complex locations of MIBG-positive neuroblastoma as a tool to overcome the difficulties associated with repeated surgeries in these patients. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of all patients with R/R neuroblastoma and MIBG-uptaking lesions who underwent radioguided surgery between February 2020 and 2023 at SJD Barcelona Children's Hospital. The Europrobe 3.2 gamma probe was used to identify neuroblastoma tissue in the operating room. RESULTS: Ten patients were identified. Radioguided surgery was useful in all patients. One patient with previous multiple operations developed an entero-cutaneous fistula with posterior full recovery. Mean surgical time was 111.7 min. The gamma probe identified 100% of neuroblastoma lesions which were all completely removed (123I-MIBG-SPECT/CT negative post-surgery). Pathology and molecular studies could be successfully performed in all samples. CONCLUSIONS: 123I-MIBG radioguided surgery proved effective in obtaining viable tissue from difficult-to-access sites in high-risk relapsed neuroblastoma.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Use of Radioguided Surgery for Small and Difficult-to-Locate Relapsed MIBG (+) High-Risk Neuroblastoma Lesions
- Date Crossref
- 30/09/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.