Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Reproductive factors and mammographic density within the International Consortium of Mammographic Density: A cross-sectional study

7Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
60Institutions déclarées
22Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cz, gb, fr, us, es, sg, mx, cl, hk, no, Kenya, my, pl, jp, au, tr, nl, ir, kr, ca, il, Égypte. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Elevated mammographic density (MD) for a woman's age and body mass index (BMI) is an established breast cancer risk factor. The relationship of parity, age at first birth, and breastfeeding with MD is less clear. We examined the associations of these factors with MD within the International Consortium of Mammographic Density (ICMD). METHODS: ICMD is a consortium of 27 studies with pooled individual-level epidemiological and MD data from 11,755 women without breast cancer aged 35-85 years from 22 countries, capturing 40 country-& ethnicity-specific population groups. MD was measured using the area-based tool Cumulus. Meta-analyses across population groups and pooled analyses were used to examine linear regression associations of square-root (√) transformed MD measures (percent MD (PMD), dense area (DA), and non-dense area (NDA)) with parity, age at first birth, ever/never breastfed and lifetime breastfeeding duration. Models were adjusted for age at mammogram, age at menarche, BMI, menopausal status, use of hormone replacement therapy, calibration method, mammogram view and reader, and parity and age at first birth when not the association of interest. RESULTS: Among 10,988 women included in these analyses, 90.1% (n = 9,895) were parous, of whom 13% (n = 1,286) had ≥ five births. The mean age at first birth was 24.3 years (Standard deviation = 5.1). Increasing parity (per birth) was inversely associated with √PMD (β: - 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 0.07, - 0.03) and √DA (β: - 0.08, 95% CI: - 0.12, - 0.05) with this trend evident until at least nine births. Women who were older at first birth (per five-year increase) had higher √PMD (β:0.06, 95% CI:0.03, 0.10) and √DA (β:0.06, 95% CI:0.02, 0.10), and lower √NDA (β: - 0.06, 95% CI: - 0.11, - 0.01). In stratified analyses, this association was only evident in women who were post-menopausal at MD assessment. Among parous women, no associations were found between ever/never breastfed or lifetime breastfeeding duration (per six-month increase) and √MD. CONCLUSIONS: Associations with higher parity and older age at first birth with √MD were consistent with the direction of their respective associations with breast cancer risk. Further research is needed to understand reproductive factor-related differences in the composition of breast tissue and their associations with breast cancer risk.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Reproductive factors and mammographic density within the International Consortium of Mammographic Density: A cross-sectional study
Date Crossref
30/09/2024
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Mercer (Czechia)Southmead HospitalUniversity of BristolCentre international de recherche sur le cancerUniversity of Hawaiʻi at MānoaUniversity of Hawaii SystemCancer Center of HawaiiUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIEscuela Nacional de SanidadCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud PúblicaMayo Clinic in FloridaNational University of SingaporeNational University Health SystemInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaBrigham and Women's HospitalHarvard UniversityUniversity of ChileCornell UniversityWeill Cornell MedicineBoston UniversityChinese University of Hong KongHong Kong Sanatorium and HospitalUniversity of Hong KongUniversity of Southern CaliforniaNorwegian Institute of Public HealthUniversity of OsloCancer Registry of NorwayCity Of Hope National Medical CenterNinewells HospitalQueen Mary University of LondonRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustAga Khan University Hospital NairobiAga Khan University NairobiUniversity Malaya Medical CentreUniversity of MalayaCancer Research MalaysiaNofer Institute of Occupational MedicineGifu UniversityThe University of Western AustraliaThe University of MelbourneCancer Council VictoriaIstanbul UniversityAcıbadem UniversityUniversity Medical Center UtrechtGeorge Washington University HospitalUniversity of California, San FranciscoUniversity of California SystemIsfahan University of Medical SciencesUniversity College LondonAsan Medical CenterNational University HospitalAgency for Science, Technology and ResearchCancer Care OntarioPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreTechnion – Israel Institute of TechnologySamuel Neaman Institute for National Policy ResearchRappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical SciencesCairo University hospitalsLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Digital Radiography and Breast ImagingCancer Risks and FactorsBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.