Endoscopic vacuum therapy for treatment of large distal anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery
Rattachement africain : it, cl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Management of anastomotic dehiscences following colorectal surgery is a topic of debate. In this context, endoluminal vacuum therapy offers promising results. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and feasibility of endoluminal vacuum therapy in distal anastomotic dehiscences after colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a descriptive case series that evaluates patients with anastomotic dehiscences over a period of 18 months. All patients were treated with Endo-sponge® (Braun Medical, Hessen, Germany). RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in the final analysis. The indications for endoluminal vacuum therapy were Hartmann's stump insufficiency (n=6), anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (n=4), and anastomotic dehiscence after transanal total mesorectal excision (n=4). A total of 204 sponges were placed per patient (median 12.5, range 1-33). Complete resolution was achieved in 9 patients (57.1%) in a mean time of 108 days (range 15-160 days). In the sub-analysis, patients with acute dehiscence (<3 months) achieved complete resolution in 80% (8/10), whereas no patient with chronic defects reached resolution (0/4). A low complication rate (7%) was recorded. CONCLUSION: Endoluminal vacuum therapy appears to be a feasible and safe treatment with a high success rate in patients with large acute colorectal anastomotic defects.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Endoscopic vacuum therapy for treatment of large distal anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery
- Date Crossref
- 30/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.