Subtraction of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) in Radioembolization: A Comparison of Four Methods
Rattachement africain : nl, th. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Subtraction of SPECT images has several clinical applications, but can be challenging due to high noise levels and poor resolution. In this work, we compared four methods of obtaining a difference SPECT image. As a use case, we investigated the technical performance of SPECT subtraction to quantify the effect of angiotensin-II on the ${ }^{99 \mathrm{~m}} \mathrm{Tc}$-MAA liver distribution during hepatic radioembolization using an innovative hybrid C-arm scanner. The included methods were (i) straightforward image subtraction, (ii) projection subtraction, (iii) projection addition during iterative reconstruction and (iv) image addition during iterative reconstruction. Utilizing digital simulations (XCAT) and phantom studies (NEMA-IQ and anthropomorphic torso), we found that all methods were able to generate difference images. Image subtraction showed the best quantitative performance but the worst visual quality due to high noise levels. Image addition resulted in the best visual image quality but had a quantitative bias when the two images to subtract contained opposing features. Since quantitative accuracy is most important for the dosimetric investigation of angiotensin-II, we recommend using the image subtraction method for this purpose.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Subtraction of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) in Radioembolization: A Comparison of Four Methods
- Date Crossref
- 26/10/2024
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.