Clinico-Genetic Profiles of Seven Patients With PINK1-Related Parkinson’s Disease: A Case Series From a Tertiary Care Centre in India and a Review of the Literature
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Recessive variants in the PINK1 gene are known causes of early-onset Parkinson's disease (EOPD). To describe the clinical features and genetic profiles of patients with PINK1-related Parkinson's disease (PARK-PINK1) mutations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of the demographic, clinical and genetic details of patients from our database carrying biallelic PINK1 variants. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients whose median age at onset was 33 years (range: 20-49) were recruited. All had asymmetrical onset, tremors were present in 4 patients, abnormal posturing was present in 2 patients, and slowness was present in 1 patient. The parkinsonism phenotype was noted in 6 patients (with dystonia in four) and isolated dystonia in one. Among the 6 patients with parkinsonism, five had rest tremors, all had good levodopa responses, and four had motor fluctuations with choreiform dyskinesia. Exome sequencing revealed biallelic pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, five of which were novel. CONCLUSION: PARK-PINK1 presents as an EOPD with tremor-predominant phenotype, good levodopa-responsiveness, early motor fluctuation and dyskinesia. We describe five novel variants in PINK1 gene.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinico-Genetic Profiles of Seven Patients With PINK1-Related Parkinson’s Disease: A Case Series From a Tertiary Care Centre in India and a Review of the Literature
- Date Crossref
- 31/10/2024
- Éditeur
- The Korean Movement Disorder Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.