Detection of antibody–drug conjugate-induced interstitial lung disease using circulating cell-free DNA
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: The increasing use and anticipated future adoption of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) present a significant challenge in identifying and monitoring patients for the development of potentially fatal drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD). We sought to apply a tissue-specific methylation analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to measure lung damage in patients with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)-related ILD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe a patient with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive endometrial cancer who developed ILD during T-DXd treatment. Blood samples collected at the time of ILD diagnosis, after recovery, and following rechallenge were studied for lung damage using lung-specific methylation markers in cfDNA. To validate the findings, we also tested plasma samples from an additional cohort of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with T-DXd. RESULTS: In patients with HER2-positive metastatic cancer treated with T-DXd, the presence of an active ILD, as assessed clinically and using chest computed tomography, was associated with increased levels of lung-derived cfDNA. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that liquid biopsy can be developed as a valuable tool for detecting and monitoring ADC-related ILD. Its low cost and simplicity make it a potential alternative to current imaging methods, warranting further clinical development.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Detection of antibody–drug conjugate-induced interstitial lung disease using circulating cell-free DNA
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.