COMPARISON OF DIRECT STENTING VERSUS PRE-DILATION OUTCOMES IN PRIMARY PCI AT A MAJOR HOSPITAL

Le résumé fourni par la source

Stents are utilized in over 95% of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), and advancements in balloon and stent technologies have fostered the development of direct stent (DS) delivery. This approach, which bypasses pre-dilatation, may offer distinct advantages over conventional stenting (CS), which includes balloon dilation before stenting. Objective: To evaluate the angiographic and short-term clinical outcomes of direct stent placement compared to traditional stenting following balloon dilation in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2023 to May 2024 at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Pakistan. One hundred patients undergoing primary PCI were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (n=50) received direct stent placement, and Group B (n=50) underwent stenting following balloon dilation. Data collection included demographic details, coronary intervention details, and procedural outcomes from medical records. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, with Independent samples t-tests used to compare fluoroscopy times, procedure durations, and contrast usage, considering a P-value < 0.05 as significant. Results: The study enrolled 100 patients, with a mean age of 52.8 ± 11.0 years; 76% were male. The most commonly treated vessel was the left anterior descending artery. Group A demonstrated a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (4.6 ± 2.9 minutes vs. 6.9 ± 4.1 minutes, P=0.001) and total procedure duration (24.4 ± 12.4 minutes vs. 34.6 ± 13.5 minutes, P=0.008) compared to Group B. Furthermore, Group A used less contrast material than Group B. Conclusion: Direct stenting offers a safer, quicker, and more cost-effective alternative to conventional stenting with balloon dilation in primary PCI. This method reduces radiation exposure, procedural costs, and operational time, potentially enhancing outcomes for patients and healthcare teams.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.