The cost-of-illness of multiple sclerosis in Jordan
Rattachement africain : jo. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) imposes a significant financial burden on health-care systems. This study aims to determine the cost-of-illness (COI) for MS in Jordan, a country where data on the economic impact of MS are scarce. METHODS: Data were collected for one year, annual COI was estimated using a cross-sectional snowball sampling design. Eligible patients completed a self-reported questionnaire to provide sociodemographic, physician visit, and diagnostic and laboratory test data. Indirect costs were estimated using an adjusted Human Capital Approach. RESULTS: This study included 383 patients, (73% females, 61% between 26-45). Eighty % took disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), and 40% had relapses in that year. One-third use non-DMTs and equipment for assistance. The average annual cost per patient was $11,719 (direct costs=$11,252, indirect costs=$467). The total annual cost for all participants was $748,299. The estimated cost of non-DMT, medical tools, diagnostic tests, and hospitalization per patient was $53, 51, 99, and 235 respectively. CONCLUSION: High costs of DMTs state the necessity of resource optimization in Jordan public healthcare facilities. Such findings yield policy-informing actionable insights, suggesting strategic investments in more cost-effective DMTs with potential improvement in accessibility and reduction in the overall economic burden faced by both patients and governments.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The cost-of-illness of multiple sclerosis in Jordan
- Date Crossref
- 23/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.