Tabuthema Fehlgeburt? – Verankerung durch Mechanismen auf medizinischer, sozialer und organisationaler Ebene „Es hat mir mein Herz gebrochen und es ist halt so ...“
Rattachement africain : at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Miscarriage is the most common complication of pregnancy. In this work, the experiences associated with miscarriage and their relevance for the women are analysed on different levels. METHOD: In May 2023, 14 guided interviews were conducted with women. The text material obtained will be brought to a higher level of abstraction using Mayring's content analysis approach and then interpreted. RESULTS: The results of the study underpin the significance of a miscarriage as a dramatic experience and the assumption of a broad taboo experienced as stressful. The deliberately chosen exchange among like-minded people, the concealment of the pregnancy and subsequently the miscarriage for reasons of shame, self-protection from professional disadvantages, and the assumption of overburdening the partner do not weigh as heavily as those mechanisms that operate in the health sector: at this level, mistrust, trivialisation and organisational and spatial inadequacies contribute to tabooing. The stressful circumstance of miscarriage is cushioned by people who recognise the grief and offer support. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the study, improvements can be derived primarily in the area of care: Recognition of miscarriage, needs-based support services, improvement of communicative elements and organisational and spatial framework conditions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tabuthema Fehlgeburt? – Verankerung durch Mechanismen auf medizinischer, sozialer und organisationaler Ebene „Es hat mir mein Herz gebrochen und es ist halt so ...“
- Date Crossref
- 18/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.