Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Mammals show faster recovery from capture and tagging in human-disturbed landscapes

29Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
74Institutions déclarées
21Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de, dk, us, nl, it, Afrique du Sud, fr, Kenya, cr, cz, my, gb, ca, ch, Namibie, no, se, at, pl, es, in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Wildlife tagging provides critical insights into animal movement ecology, physiology, and behavior amid global ecosystem changes. However, the stress induced by capture, handling, and tagging can impact post-release locomotion and activity and, consequently, the interpretation of study results. Here, we analyze post-tagging effects on 1585 individuals of 42 terrestrial mammal species using collar-collected GPS and accelerometer data. Species-specific displacements and overall dynamic body acceleration, as a proxy for activity, were assessed over 20 days post-release to quantify disturbance intensity, recovery duration, and speed. Differences were evaluated, considering species-specific traits and the human footprint of the study region. Over 70% of the analyzed species exhibited significant behavioral changes following collaring events. Herbivores traveled farther with variable activity reactions, while omnivores and carnivores were initially less active and mobile. Recovery duration proved brief, with alterations diminishing within 4-7 tracking days for most species. Herbivores, particularly males, showed quicker displacement recovery (4 days) but slower activity recovery (7 days). Individuals in high human footprint areas displayed faster recovery, indicating adaptation to human disturbance. Our findings emphasize the necessity of extending tracking periods beyond 1 week and particular caution in remote study areas or herbivore-focused research, specifically in smaller mammals.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Mammals show faster recovery from capture and tagging in human-disturbed landscapes
Date Crossref
15/09/2024
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

University of PotsdamAarhus UniversityGoethe University FrankfurtSmithsonian Conservation Biology InstituteSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research CentreNational Zoological ParkRadboud University NijmegenRadboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Molecular Life SciencesUniversity of SassariBaden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State UniversityUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife ResearchEnvironment ParkMichigan State UniversityGénomique Métabolique du GenoscopeMpala Research Center and Wildlife FoundationUniversity of California, DavisMax Planck Institute for OrnithologySaint Louis ZooSaint Louis UniversityFondazione Edmund MachNational Biodiversity InstituteUniversity of PalermoNederlands Instituut Voor Zuivel OonderzoekTexas A&M UniversityMendel University in BrnoSabah Wildlife DepartmentCardiff UniversityUniversity of California, San FranciscoChicago State UniversityGerman Primate CenterKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of ZurichUniversity of California, BerkeleyUniversity of WyomingUniversity of FerraraNamibia University of Science and TechnologyNorwegian Institute for Nature ResearchUniversity of FreiburgBavarian Forest National ParkUniversity of Inland NorwayUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-PyrénéesInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'EnvironnementHalmstad UniversityCzech University of Life Sciences PragueUniversity of Veterinary Medicine ViennaMammal Research InstitutePolish Academy of SciencesUniversity of GöttingenSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of California, Santa CruzOffice National de la Chasse et de la Faune SauvageGregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant BiologyBOKU UniversityTechnical University of MunichGran Telescopio Canarias (Spain)University of PaduaFrench National Agency for Water and Aquatic EnvironmentsBielefeld UniversityConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasEstación Biológica de DoñanaInstitute of Nature ConservationUniversidad de HuelvaPanthera CorporationUniversity College LondonCopenhagen ZooMississippi State UniversityAlaska Department of Fish and GameIndian Institute of Science BangaloreAshoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the EnvironmentDBT/Wellcome Trust India AllianceRoztocze National Park

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Wildlife Ecology and ConservationSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeBat Biology and Ecology Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.