Rationale for creating a new classification for evaluation superficial lymph nodes US NODE-RADS (Russian version) based on ultrasound data: the consensus of experts of the Russian Association of Ultrasound Diagnostics in Medicine
Rattachement africain : ru, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The article presents the most informative ultrasound (US) signs of unchanged, "reactive," lymphoproliferative and metastatic lymph nodes (LN). A literature analysis was conducted on the stratification of US-signs of malignancy of the LN, on the basis of which it was concluded that at present time there is no single classification of US-signs of pathological changes in the LN, existing classifications have been developed to assess the LN in some regions, include from 3 to 5 categories and are not used everywhere. Due to certain difficulties in interpreting the nature of the LN lesions associated with their localization, size, number, severity of response to the infectious process and presence of oncological history of the patient, it is justified to create a unified classification of US signs of the LN changes employing 6 categories that is similar to previously accepted classifications of radiation diagnostics TI-RADS, BI-RADS. For a wide discussion by experts, it is proposed a draft classification Node-RADS for stratification US-signs of surface LN.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Rationale for creating a new classification for evaluation superficial lymph nodes US NODE-RADS (Russian version) based on ultrasound data: the consensus of experts of the Russian Association of Ultrasound Diagnostics in Medicine
- Date Crossref
- 12/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Publishing House ABV Press
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.