Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Observational cohort study on safety and efficacy of robotic thyroidectomy with super-meticulous capsular dissection versus open surgery for thyroid cancer: postoperative dynamic risk assessment of radioactive iodine therapy

5Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) with super-meticulous capsular dissection (SMCD) versus open thyroidectomy (OT), the authors used a dynamic risk assessment system incorporating 131 I-WBS along with radioactive iodine (RAI) efficacy evaluation. BACKGROUND: Currently, the therapeutic efficacy of robotic surgery remains controversial. The 131 I whole-body scan ( 131 I-WBS) dynamic risk assessment system can detect small residual thyroid tissues and lesions, which may be used as indicators for the surgical efficacy of RT or OT thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 2349 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy followed by RAI therapy in our department between August 2017 and June 2023. Propensity score matching was performed at a ratio of 1:3 based on surgical type and mean follow-up duration to minimize selection bias after excluding those lost to follow-up. The primary outcome was surgical completeness, assessed using a dynamic risk system incorporating 131 I-WBS along with RAI efficacy evaluation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of metastatic lymph nodes removed between the two groups ( P =0.45). The incidence rate of parathyroid gland transplantation was 395 (68.7%) in the OT group and 8 (3.8%) in the RT group ( P <0.001). There were no differences in the thyroidectomy completeness based on the 3 h iodine uptake rate and 99m TcO 4- thyroid imaging between the two groups. The dynamic risk assessment with and without 131 I-WBS showed significant differences ( P <0.001). The postoperative and post-RAI dynamic risk scores, evaluated at the time of RAI and 6 months after RAI, did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P >0.05). The rates of transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism were higher in the OT group than in the RT group ( P <0.05). The local recurrence rates showed no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that RT with SMCD can achieve outcomes equivalent to those of traditional open surgery when integrating the 131 I-WBS dynamic evaluation system and the therapeutic effects of RAI. Additionally, robot surgery demonstrated a notable advantage in protecting parathyroid function.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Observational cohort study on safety and efficacy of robotic thyroidectomy with super-meticulous capsular dissection versus open surgery for thyroid cancer: postoperative dynamic risk assessment of radioactive iodine therapy
Date Crossref
12/09/2024
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryManagement of metastatic bone disease

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.