Neural Representations of Extrasystoles: A Predictive Coding Perspective

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract The coordinated interplay between brain and body is essential for survival, with the heart-brain axis playing a fundamental role in perceptual, cognitive and motor processes. Central to this interaction, the heart-evoked potential (HEP) represents a neural correlate of the heart activity. Further, the HEP is thought to represent a neuronal prediction for each heartbeat, raising questions about its role in arrhythmia. Yet, previous studies have primarily focused on regular heart rhythms, with only a few investigations delving into arrhythmias and, notably, none into extrasystoles, a form of benign arrhythmias that disrupt the regular heart rhythm. Extrasystoles represent a unique possibility for investigating brain responses to unexpected pronounced alterations in heart rhythm. We took advantage of the largest dataset (103 subjects with 3000 extrasystoles), including both EEG and ECG recordings, and analysed the neural response to both types of extrasystoles (supraventricular and ventricular) using multiverse approaches and control analysis in time and source space. We found that the HEP was significantly reduced for ventricular extrasystoles with underlying sources in the left insular. For the postextrasystolic beat of both types of extrasystoles, we found a significantly earlier and increased HEP originating from sources in the left frontal orbital cortex and the anterior cingulate gyri. The reduced HEP response to the ventricular extrasystole might result from inactive interoceptive cardiac pathways. In contrast, increased HEP of the postextrasystolic beat along with the anatomical neural HEP generators may reflect an interoceptive prediction error arising from a naturally occurring discrepancy between the predicted and actual heart rhythm, with a main source in the anterior cingulate gyri, a primary location for prediction error processing.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.