Recommendations to address and research systemic bias in assessment: perspectives from directors of research in medical education
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Addressing systemic bias in medical school assessment is an urgent task for medical education. This paper outlines recommendations on topic areas for further research on systemic bias, developed from a workshop discussion at the 2023 annual meeting of the Society of Directors of Research in Medical Education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the workshop, directors engaged in small-group discussions on guidelines to address bias in assessment practices following a proposed categorization of 'Do's,' 'Don'ts,' and 'Don't knows' and listed their insights using anonymous sticky notes, which were shared and discussed with the larger group of participants. The authors performed a content analysis of the notes through deductive and inductive coding. We reviewed and discussed our analysis to reach consensus. RESULTS: The workshop included 31 participants from 28 institutions across the US and Canada, generating 51 unique notes. Participants identified 23 research areas in need of further study. The inductive analysis of proposed research areas revealed four main topics: 1) The role of interventions, including pre-medical academic interventions, medical-education interventions, assessment approaches, and wellness interventions; 2) Professional development, including the definition and assessment of professionalism and professional identity formation; 3) Context, including patient care and systemic influences; and 4) Research approaches. DISCUSSION: While limited to data from a single workshop, the results offered perspectives about areas for further research shared by a group of directors of medical education research units from diverse backgrounds. The workshop produced valuable insights into the need for more evidence-based interventions that promote more equitable assessment practices grounded in real-world situations and that attenuate the effects of bias.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Recommendations to address and research systemic bias in assessment: perspectives from directors of research in medical education
- Date Crossref
- 08/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Anesthesiology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Northwestern University Department of Medical Education pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Tufts University Office of Educational Affairs pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Office of Education pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
University of Vermont Teaching Academy pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Washington University in St. Louis Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Harvard University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
New York University Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Department of Pediatrics pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Department of Anesthesiology — University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medical Education — Northwestern University et Office of Educational Affairs — Tufts University, avec 6 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.