The ankle–brachial index, gastrocnemius mitochondrial respirometry, and walking performance in people with and without peripheral artery disease

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Mitochondrial abnormalities exist in lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD), yet the association of the ankle–brachial index (ABI) with mitochondrial respiration in gastrocnemius muscle is unknown. The association of gastrocnemius mitochondrial respiration with 6-minute walk distance in PAD is unknown. This objective of this study was to describe associations of the ABI with mitochondrial respiratory function in gastrocnemius muscle biopsies and associations of gastrocnemius mitochondrial respirometry with 6-minute walk distance in people with and without PAD. Methods: People with (ABI ⩽ 0.90) and without (ABI 1.00–1.40) PAD were enrolled. ABI and 6-minute walk distance were measured. Mitochondrial function of permeabilized myofibers from gastrocnemius biopsies was measured with high-resolution respirometry. Results: A total of 30 people with PAD (71.7 years, mean ABI: 0.64) and 68 without PAD (71.8 years, ABI: 1.17) participated. In non-PAD participants, higher ABI values were associated significantly with better mitochondrial respiration (Pearson correlation for maximal oxidative phosphorylation P CI+II : +0.29, p = 0.016). In PAD, the ABI correlated negatively and not significantly with mitochondrial respiration (Pearson correlation for P CI+II : –0.17, p = 0.38). In people without PAD, better mitochondrial respiration was associated with better 6-minute walk distance (Pearson correlation: +0.51, p < 0.001), but this association was not present in PAD (Pearson correlation: +0.10, p = 0.59). Conclusions: Major differences exist between people with and without PAD in the association of gastrocnemius mitochondrial respiration with ABI and 6-minute walk distance. Among people without PAD, ABI and walking performance were positively associated with mitochondrial respiratory function. These associations were not observed in PAD.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.