Defensive freezing sharpens threat-reward information processing during approach-avoidance decision making
Rattachement africain : nl, cz. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract People regularly face approach-avoidance dilemmas which require minimization of potential threat whilst maximizing potential reward. Defensive reactions to threat, such as transient states of freezing, influence integration of reward/threat information in the dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC). However, the mechanism of this integration between internal state and external value (state-value integration) remains unknown. Here, we decoded approach-avoidance decisions under threat using high-precision magnetoencephalography (MEG). Threat-induced cardiac deceleration (indicative of defensive freezing) was trial-by-trial associated with more pronounced effects of reward and threat magnitudes on approach-avoidance choices. Time-resolved decoding of threat-reward information from neural signals predicted approach-avoidance choices several seconds before the actual response. Crucially, during freezing, 6-12 Hz coherence between threat-reward information and dACC neural activity increased, suggesting that defensive freezing sharpens threat/reward processing during approach-avoidance decision making. These findings provide a potential neural mechanism by which threat-induced freezing can facilitate information integration, essential for optimal decision making under threat.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Defensive freezing sharpens threat-reward information processing during approach-avoidance decision making
- Date Crossref
- 30/08/2024
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.