Journey Through Autosomal-Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix–Saguenay: Insights From a Case Series of Seven Patients–A Single-Center Study and Review of an Indian Cohort
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we describe the clinical and investigative profiles of 7 cases of autosomal-recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of genetically proven cases of ARSACS from our database. Additionally, we reviewed the literature for reported cases of ARSACS from India. RESULTS: All 7 patients experienced disease onset within the first decade of life. According to the available data, all patients had walking difficulty (7/7), spastic ataxia (7/7), classical neuroimaging findings (7/7), sensory‒motor demyelinating polyneuropathy (6/6), abnormal evoked potentials (5/5), and a thickened retinal nerve fiber layer (3/3). Exome sequencing revealed 8 unique pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (6 novel) in the SACS gene. An additional 21 cases (18 families) of ARSACS that could be identified from India had similar clinical and investigational findings. The most common c.8793delA variant may have a founder effect. CONCLUSION: Our series adds to the previously reported cases of ARSACS from India and expands the genetic spectrum by adding 6 novel variants.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Journey Through Autosomal-Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix–Saguenay: Insights From a Case Series of Seven Patients–A Single-Center Study and Review of an Indian Cohort
- Date Crossref
- 31/10/2024
- Éditeur
- The Korean Movement Disorder Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.