Through the Lens of Societal Norms and Experiences: Students’ Conceptualization of Patient Case Data When Diversity is Apparent

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: There are increasing calls to improve the representation of diversity within case-based learning materials, yet it is unclear how students interpret the inclusion of diversity data when synthesizing case information. The objective of this study was to determine factors that influence students' interpretation of written case data for visualization of a patient case. METHODS: This was a qualitative study using interviews. Entry-to-practice pharmacy students from Dalhousie University in Canada were recruited to review 6 cases, each with varying representations of diversity (eg, race, sexual orientation, gender, relationship status, disability, or none). Students were prompted to state how they visualized the case patient and what factors influenced their perceptions. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to interpret themes. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 18 students. Students relied on 5 factors when interpreting case data in the presence of diversity. In addition to the case data itself, these included personal experience (relating to themselves or personal relationships), professional experience (through work or school), population stereotypes, and perceived societal norms. CONCLUSION: This study found that students rely on their personal and professional experiences, perceptions, and social conditioning when interpreting the presence of diversity within learning materials. Findings support the notion that educators should deliberately and conscientiously expose students to a broad representation of diverse populations to increase students' knowledge and understanding of populations, and to create intentional time and space to challenge existing stereotypes that contribute to the inequities in health care.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.