Characterizing the Mutational Landscape of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in a Prospective Cohort of Mexican Patients
Rattachement africain : mx, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common B-cell malignancy worldwide. Molecular classifications have tried to improve cure rates. We prospectively examined and correlated the mutational landscape with the clinical features and outcomes of 185 Mexican patients (median age 59.3 years, 50% women) with newly diagnosed DLBCL. A customized panel of 79 genes was designed, based on previous international series. Most patients had ECOG performance status (PS) < 2 (69.2%), advanced-stage disease (72.4%), germinal-center phenotype (68.1%), and double-hit lymphomas (14.1%). One hundred and ten (59.5%) patients had at least one gene with driver mutations. The most common mutated genes were as follows: TP53, EZH2, CREBBP, NOTCH1, and KMT2D. The median follow-up was 42 months, and the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 70% and 72%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, both age > 50 years and ECOG PS > 2 were significantly associated with a worse OS. Our investigation did not reveal any discernible correlation between the presence of a specific mutation and survival. In conclusion, using a customized panel, we characterized the mutational landscape of a large cohort of Mexican DLBCL patients. These results need to be confirmed in further studies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Characterizing the Mutational Landscape of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in a Prospective Cohort of Mexican Patients
- Date Crossref
- 28/08/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.