A cellulose-binding domain specific for native crystalline cellulose in lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from the brown-rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum
Résumé fourni par la source
Cellulose-binding domains (CBDs) play a vital role in cellulose degradation by enzymes. Despite the strong ability of brown-rot fungi to degrade cellulose in wood, they have been considered to lack or have a low number of enzymes with CBD. Here, we report the C-terminal domain of a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from the brown-rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum (GtLPMO9A-2) functions as a CBD, classified as a new family of carbohydrate-binding module, CBM104. The amino acid sequence of GtCBM104 shows no similarity to any known CBDs. A BLAST search identified 84 homologous sequences at the C-terminus of some CAZymes, mainly LPMO9, in basidiomycetous genomes. Binding experiments revealed GtCBM104 binds selectively to native crystalline cellulose (cellulose I), but not to artificially modified crystalline or amorphous cellulose, while the typical fungal CBD (CBM1) bound to all cellulosic materials tested. The adsorption efficiency of GtCBM104 to cellulose I was >20-times higher than that of CBM1. Adsorption tests and microscopic observations strongly suggested that GtCBM104 binds to the hydrophilic regions of cellulose microfibrils, while CBM1 recognizes the hydrophobic surface. The discovery of GtCBM104 strongly suggests that the contribution of CBD to the cellulose enzymatic degradation mechanism of brown-rot fungi is much larger than previously thought.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A cellulose-binding domain specific for native crystalline cellulose in lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from the brown-rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.