Pattern of pareses in 5q-spinal muscular atrophy
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: This prospective study investigates the pattern of pareses in 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) to identify disease-specific characteristics and potential differences from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA). Detailed knowledge about pareses patterns in SMA facilitates differential diagnosis and supports therapeutic monitoring. Methods: Between January 2021, and June 2021, 66 SMA patients (59.1% male, aged 33.6 ± 15.2 years) were included in the study. Most patients had SMA type II ( n = 28) or SMA type III ( n = 28), seven patients had SMA type I, and three patients had SMA type IV. We analyzed the pattern of pareses using the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) scoring system. Results: In both, upper and lower limbs muscle weakness was less pronounced in distal (upper limbs: MRC median 3.0 (interquartile range 1.5–3.5); lower limbs: 1.5 (0.5–3.0)) compared to proximal muscle groups (upper limbs: 2.0 (1.5–2.6); p < 0.001; lower limbs: 0.5 (0.5–1.5); p < 0.001). Thenar muscles were stronger than other small hand muscles (3.0 (2.0–3.5) vs 3.0 (1.5–3.5); p = 0.004). Muscles had more strength in upper (2.3 (1.5–3.1)) compared to lower limbs (1.1 (0.5–2.3); p < 0.001) and in flexors compared to extensors. Conclusion: We identified a specific pattern of muscle paresis in SMA which is different from the pattern of paresis in ALS and SBMA. As a rule of thumb, the pattern of pareses is similar, but not identical to ALS in distal, but different in proximal muscle groups.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pattern of pareses in 5q-spinal muscular atrophy
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2024
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.