Evaluation of automated pediatric sleep stage classification using U-Sleep - a convolutional neural network

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Study Objectives U-Sleep is a publicly-available automated sleep stager, but has not been independently validated using pediatric data. We aimed to a) test the hypothesis that U-Sleep performance is equivalent to trained humans, using a concordance dataset of 50 pediatric polysomnogram excerpts scored by multiple trained scorers, and b) identify clinical and demographic characteristics that impact U-Sleep accuracy, using a clinical dataset of 3114 polysomnograms from a tertiary center. Methods Agreement between U-Sleep and ‘gold’ 30-second epoch sleep staging was determined across both datasets. Utilizing the concordance dataset, the hypothesis of equivalence between human scorers and U-Sleep was tested using a Wilcoxon two one-sided test (TOST). Multivariable regression and generalized additive modelling were used on the clinical dataset to estimate the effects of age, comorbidities and polysomnographic findings on U-Sleep performance. Results The median (interquartile range) Cohen’s kappa agreement of U-Sleep and individual trained humans relative to “gold” scoring for 5-stage sleep staging in the concordance dataset were similar, kappa=0.79(0.19) vs 0.78(0.13) respectively, and satisfied statistical equivalence (TOST p<0.01). Median (interquartile range) kappa agreement between U-Sleep 2.0 and clinical sleep-staging was kappa=0.69(0.22). Modelling indicated lower performance for children <2 years, those with medical comorbidities possibly altering sleep electroencephalography (kappa reduction=0.07-0.15) and those with decreased sleep efficiency or sleep-disordered breathing (kappa reduction=0.1). Conclusion While U-Sleep algorithms showed statistically equivalent performance to trained scorers, accuracy was lower in children <2 years and those with sleep-disordered breathing or comorbidities affecting electroencephalography. U-Sleep is suitable for pediatric clinical utilization provided automated staging is followed by expert clinician review.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.