Aminoglycoside characterization of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
Rattachement africain : pe, br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae, especially carbapenems and aminoglycosides, is a global public health challenge. Studying the genetic relatedness of bacteria from various sources, such as humans, animals, food, and the environment, can help identify potential routes of transmission and the extent of dissemination. In this study, we examined the phenotypes and genetic features of MDR K. pneumoniae isolates. Seventy K. pneumoniae strains were selected from different sources (clinics (n=55), environmental (n=7), and animals (n=8)), 43 of which were identified as carrying the blaKPC resistance gene, with a subset featuring both blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-3 variants, with different susceptibility profiles to aminoglycosides, and whole genome sequencing was used for phylogenetic analyses. Among them, 84% (n=59/70) and 53% (n=37/70) were resistant to amikacin and gentamicin, respectively. In addition, 93% (n=65/70) of the isolates harbored resistance genes, such as aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) and different plasmid types. Phylogenetic tree analyses showed two main clusters (A and B), and the multilocus sequence type (ST) 11 was the most frequently found among Brazilian isolates. Our findings showed a heterogeneous distribution of STs profiles in the two clusters, and a close relationship between human and animal or environmental K. pneumoniae strains.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Aminoglycoside characterization of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
- Date Crossref
- 25/08/2024
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.