Impact of Right Ventricular Pressure Overload on Myocardial Stiffness Assessed by Natural Wave Imaging

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) hemodynamic performance determines the prognosis of patients with RV pressure overload. Using ultrafast ultrasound, natural wave velocity (NWV) induced by cardiac valve closure was proposed as a new surrogate to quantify myocardial stiffness. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess RV NWV in rodent models and children with RV pressure overload vs control subjects and to correlate NWV with RV hemodynamic parameters. METHODS: Six-week-old rats were randomized to pulmonary artery banding (n = 6), Sugen hypoxia-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension (n = 7), or sham (n = 6) groups. They underwent natural wave imaging, echocardiography, and hemodynamic assessment at baseline and 6 weeks postoperatively. The authors analyzed NWV after tricuspid and after pulmonary valve closure (TVC and PVC, respectively). Conductance catheters were used to generate pressure-volume loops. In parallel, the authors prospectively recruited 14 children (7 RV pressure overload; 7 age-matched control subjects) and compared RV NWV with echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic parameters. RESULTS: (r = 0.75; P < 0.005) and RV Ees (r = 0.81; P < 0.005). NWV after PVC correlated with both diastolic and systolic parameters and notably with RV end-diastolic pressure (r = 0.65; P < 0.01). In children, NWV after both right valves closure in RV pressure overload were higher than in healthy volunteers (P < 0.01). NWV after PVC correlated with RV E/E' (r = 0.81; P = 0.008) and with RV chamber stiffness (r = 0.97; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Both RV early-systolic and early-diastolic myocardial stiffness show significant increase in response to pressure overload. Based on physiology and our observations, early-systolic myocardial stiffness may reflect contractility, whereas early-diastolic myocardial stiffness might be indicative of diastolic function.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.