Endothelial cell heterogeneity in colorectal cancer: tip cells drive angiogenesis
Rattachement africain : cn, kn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study aims to uncover the heterogeneity of endothelial cells (ECs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and their crucial role in angiogenesis, with a special focus on tip cells. Using single-cell RNA sequencing to profile ECs, our data suggests that CRC ECs predominantly exhibit enhanced angiogenesis and decreased antigen presentation, a shift in phenotype largely steered by tip cells. We also observed that an increase in the density and proportion of tip cells correlates with CRC occurrence, progression, and poorer patient prognosis. Furthermore, we identified endothelial cell-specific molecule 1 (ESM1), specifically expressed in tip cells, sustains a VEGFA-KDR-ESM1 positive feedback loop, promoting angiogenesis and CRC proliferation and migration. We also found the enrichment of KDR in tip cells and spotlight a unique long-tail effect in VEGFA expression: while VEGFA is primarily expressed by epithelial cells, the highest level of VEGFA expression is found in individual myeloid cells. Moreover, we observed that effective PD-1 blockade immunotherapy significantly reduced tip cells, disrupting the VEGFA-KDR-ESM1 positive feedback loop in the process. Our investigation into the heterogeneity of ECs in CRC at a single-cell level offers important insights that may contribute to the development of more effective immunotherapies targeting tip cells in CRC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Endothelial cell heterogeneity in colorectal cancer: tip cells drive angiogenesis
- Date Crossref
- 22/08/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.