Graphene-Based Complementary-Style Logic Gate with Memory-Lock
Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
As CMOS feature size vertiginously approaches atomic limits, high leakage and power density and exacer-bating IC production costs are prompting for development of new materials, devices, beyond von-Neumann architectures and computing paradigms. Within this context, graphene has emerged as a promising post-Si front runner, owing to its remarkable properties. In this paper, we propose a generic graphene-based complementary-style Boolean gate structure with memory-lock, that allows logic and non-volatile memory co-location. The gate with memory-lock is composed of 2 cells - a pull-up cell performing the gate Boolean function and a pull-down cell performing the inverted Boolean function. Each cell in turn, has a graphene logic layer that carries out Boolean gates computation, and a graphene memory layer for storing the logic state of the gate. As simulation vehicle we considered an inverter gate with memory-lock. Simulation results indicate a current ratio of write/read to/from memory of 1.64.102for gate input low, and of 2.55. 102for gate input high. Furthermore, the inverter with memory-lock exhibits a 128× smaller area footprint when compared to the traditional physically separate logic (e.g., 7nm inverter gate) and memory (e.g., 7nm 6T SRAM cell), establishing the potential of proposed structure with memory-lock for more compact and energy efficient future beyond CMOS nano-electronic implementations, and making it highly promising for high-density computations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Graphene-Based Complementary-Style Logic Gate with Memory-Lock
- Date Crossref
- 08/07/2024
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.